| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:23:45 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] mm: unify SLAB and SLUB page accounting
Hi Roman,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:30 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> Currently the page accounting code is duplicated in SLAB and SLUB
> internals. Let's move it into new (un)charge_slab_page helpers
> in the slab_common.c file. These helpers will be responsible
> for statistics (global and memcg-aware) and memcg charging.
> So they are replacing direct memcg_(un)charge_slab() calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> ---
> mm/slab.c | 19 +++----------------
> mm/slab.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/slub.c | 14 ++------------
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 14466a73d057..53e6b2687102 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -1389,7 +1389,6 @@ static struct page *kmem_getpages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags,
> int nodeid)
> {
> struct page *page;
> - int nr_pages;
>
> flags |= cachep->allocflags;
>
> @@ -1399,17 +1398,11 @@ static struct page *kmem_getpages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - if (memcg_charge_slab(page, flags, cachep->gfporder, cachep)) {
> + if (charge_slab_page(page, flags, cachep->gfporder, cachep)) {
> __free_pages(page, cachep->gfporder);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - nr_pages = (1 << cachep->gfporder);
> - if (cachep->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT)
> - mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE, nr_pages);
> - else
> - mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE, nr_pages);
> -
> __SetPageSlab(page);
> /* Record if ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS was set when allocating the slab */
> if (sk_memalloc_socks() && page_is_pfmemalloc(page))
> @@ -1424,12 +1417,6 @@ static struct page *kmem_getpages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags,
> static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct page *page)
> {
> int order = cachep->gfporder;
> - unsigned long nr_freed = (1 << order);
> -
> - if (cachep->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT)
> - mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE, -nr_freed);
> - else
> - mod_lruvec_page_state(page, NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE, -nr_freed);
>
> BUG_ON(!PageSlab(page));
> __ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(page);
> @@ -1438,8 +1425,8 @@ static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct page *page)
> page->mapping = NULL;
>
> if (current->reclaim_state)
> - current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += nr_freed;
> - memcg_uncharge_slab(page, order, cachep);
> + current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += 1 << order;
> + uncharge_slab_page(page, order, cachep);
> __free_pages(page, order);
> }
>
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index 4a261c97c138..0f5c5444acf1 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,12 @@ ssize_t slabinfo_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
> void __kmem_cache_free_bulk(struct kmem_cache *, size_t, void **);
> int __kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(struct kmem_cache *, gfp_t, size_t, void **);
>
> +static inline int cache_vmstat_idx(struct kmem_cache *s)
> +{
> + return (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ?
> + NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE : NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE;
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>
> /* List of all root caches. */
> @@ -352,6 +358,22 @@ static inline void memcg_link_cache(struct kmem_cache *s,
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
>
> +static __always_inline int charge_slab_page(struct page *page,
> + gfp_t gfp, int order,
> + struct kmem_cache *s)
> +{
> + memcg_charge_slab(page, gfp, order, s);
This does not seem right. Why the return of memcg_charge_slab is ignored?
> + mod_lruvec_page_state(page, cache_vmstat_idx(s), 1 << order);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void uncharge_slab_page(struct page *page, int order,
> + struct kmem_cache *s)
> +{
> + mod_lruvec_page_state(page, cache_vmstat_idx(s), -(1 << order));
> + memcg_uncharge_slab(page, order, s);
> +}
> +
> static inline struct kmem_cache *cache_from_obj(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x)
> {
> struct kmem_cache *cachep;
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 195f61785c7d..90563c0b3b5f 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ static inline struct page *alloc_slab_page(struct kmem_cache *s,
> else
> page = __alloc_pages_node(node, flags, order);
>
> - if (page && memcg_charge_slab(page, flags, order, s)) {
> + if (page && charge_slab_page(page, flags, order, s)) {
> __free_pages(page, order);
> page = NULL;
> }
> @@ -1692,11 +1692,6 @@ static struct page *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
> if (!page)
> return NULL;
>
> - mod_lruvec_page_state(page,
> - (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ?
> - NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE : NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE,
> - 1 << oo_order(oo));
> -
> inc_slabs_node(s, page_to_nid(page), page->objects);
>
> return page;
> @@ -1730,18 +1725,13 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page)
> check_object(s, page, p, SLUB_RED_INACTIVE);
> }
>
> - mod_lruvec_page_state(page,
> - (s->flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) ?
> - NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE : NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE,
> - -pages);
> -
> __ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(page);
> __ClearPageSlab(page);
>
> page->mapping = NULL;
> if (current->reclaim_state)
> current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += pages;
> - memcg_uncharge_slab(page, order, s);
> + uncharge_slab_page(page, order, s);
> __free_pages(page, order);
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists