| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190424170858.497370141@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:10:08 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 30/44] crypto: x86/poly1305 - fix overflow during partial reduction
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
commit 678cce4019d746da6c680c48ba9e6d417803e127 upstream.
The x86_64 implementation of Poly1305 produces the wrong result on some
inputs because poly1305_4block_avx2() incorrectly assumes that when
partially reducing the accumulator, the bits carried from limb 'd4' to
limb 'h0' fit in a 32-bit integer. This is true for poly1305-generic
which processes only one block at a time. However, it's not true for
the AVX2 implementation, which processes 4 blocks at a time and
therefore can produce intermediate limbs about 4x larger.
Fix it by making the relevant calculations use 64-bit arithmetic rather
than 32-bit. Note that most of the carries already used 64-bit
arithmetic, but the d4 -> h0 carry was different for some reason.
To be safe I also made the same change to the corresponding SSE2 code,
though that only operates on 1 or 2 blocks at a time. I don't think
it's really needed for poly1305_block_sse2(), but it doesn't hurt
because it's already x86_64 code. It *might* be needed for
poly1305_2block_sse2(), but overflows aren't easy to reproduce there.
This bug was originally detected by my patches that improve testmgr to
fuzz algorithms against their generic implementation. But also add a
test vector which reproduces it directly (in the AVX2 case).
Fixes: b1ccc8f4b631 ("crypto: poly1305 - Add a four block AVX2 variant for x86_64")
Fixes: c70f4abef07a ("crypto: poly1305 - Add a SSE2 SIMD variant for x86_64")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.3+
Cc: Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>
Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-avx2-x86_64.S | 14 +++++++---
arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-sse2-x86_64.S | 22 ++++++++++------
crypto/testmgr.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-avx2-x86_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-avx2-x86_64.S
@@ -321,6 +321,12 @@ ENTRY(poly1305_4block_avx2)
vpaddq t2,t1,t1
vmovq t1x,d4
+ # Now do a partial reduction mod (2^130)-5, carrying h0 -> h1 -> h2 ->
+ # h3 -> h4 -> h0 -> h1 to get h0,h2,h3,h4 < 2^26 and h1 < 2^26 + a small
+ # amount. Careful: we must not assume the carry bits 'd0 >> 26',
+ # 'd1 >> 26', 'd2 >> 26', 'd3 >> 26', and '(d4 >> 26) * 5' fit in 32-bit
+ # integers. It's true in a single-block implementation, but not here.
+
# d1 += d0 >> 26
mov d0,%rax
shr $26,%rax
@@ -359,16 +365,16 @@ ENTRY(poly1305_4block_avx2)
# h0 += (d4 >> 26) * 5
mov d4,%rax
shr $26,%rax
- lea (%eax,%eax,4),%eax
- add %eax,%ebx
+ lea (%rax,%rax,4),%rax
+ add %rax,%rbx
# h4 = d4 & 0x3ffffff
mov d4,%rax
and $0x3ffffff,%eax
mov %eax,h4
# h1 += h0 >> 26
- mov %ebx,%eax
- shr $26,%eax
+ mov %rbx,%rax
+ shr $26,%rax
add %eax,h1
# h0 = h0 & 0x3ffffff
andl $0x3ffffff,%ebx
--- a/arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-sse2-x86_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/crypto/poly1305-sse2-x86_64.S
@@ -251,16 +251,16 @@ ENTRY(poly1305_block_sse2)
# h0 += (d4 >> 26) * 5
mov d4,%rax
shr $26,%rax
- lea (%eax,%eax,4),%eax
- add %eax,%ebx
+ lea (%rax,%rax,4),%rax
+ add %rax,%rbx
# h4 = d4 & 0x3ffffff
mov d4,%rax
and $0x3ffffff,%eax
mov %eax,h4
# h1 += h0 >> 26
- mov %ebx,%eax
- shr $26,%eax
+ mov %rbx,%rax
+ shr $26,%rax
add %eax,h1
# h0 = h0 & 0x3ffffff
andl $0x3ffffff,%ebx
@@ -518,6 +518,12 @@ ENTRY(poly1305_2block_sse2)
paddq t2,t1
movq t1,d4
+ # Now do a partial reduction mod (2^130)-5, carrying h0 -> h1 -> h2 ->
+ # h3 -> h4 -> h0 -> h1 to get h0,h2,h3,h4 < 2^26 and h1 < 2^26 + a small
+ # amount. Careful: we must not assume the carry bits 'd0 >> 26',
+ # 'd1 >> 26', 'd2 >> 26', 'd3 >> 26', and '(d4 >> 26) * 5' fit in 32-bit
+ # integers. It's true in a single-block implementation, but not here.
+
# d1 += d0 >> 26
mov d0,%rax
shr $26,%rax
@@ -556,16 +562,16 @@ ENTRY(poly1305_2block_sse2)
# h0 += (d4 >> 26) * 5
mov d4,%rax
shr $26,%rax
- lea (%eax,%eax,4),%eax
- add %eax,%ebx
+ lea (%rax,%rax,4),%rax
+ add %rax,%rbx
# h4 = d4 & 0x3ffffff
mov d4,%rax
and $0x3ffffff,%eax
mov %eax,h4
# h1 += h0 >> 26
- mov %ebx,%eax
- shr $26,%eax
+ mov %rbx,%rax
+ shr $26,%rax
add %eax,h1
# h0 = h0 & 0x3ffffff
andl $0x3ffffff,%ebx
--- a/crypto/testmgr.h
+++ b/crypto/testmgr.h
@@ -4527,7 +4527,49 @@ static struct hash_testvec poly1305_tv_t
.psize = 80,
.digest = "\x13\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00"
"\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00",
- },
+ }, { /* Regression test for overflow in AVX2 implementation */
+ .plaintext = "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff"
+ "\xff\xff\xff\xff",
+ .psize = 300,
+ .digest = "\xfb\x5e\x96\xd8\x61\xd5\xc7\xc8"
+ "\x78\xe5\x87\xcc\x2d\x5a\x22\xe1",
+ }
};
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists