linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.0 083/115] ipmi: fix sleep-in-atomic in free_user at cleanup SRCU user->release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190424170929.794865018@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:10:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 083/115] ipmi: fix sleep-in-atomic in free_user at cleanup SRCU user->release_barrier

From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>

commit 3b9a907223d7f6b9d1dadea29436842ae9bcd76d upstream.

free_user() could be called in atomic context.

This patch pushed the free operation off into a workqueue.

Example:

 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2856
 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 177, name: ksoftirqd/27
 CPU: 27 PID: 177 Comm: ksoftirqd/27 Not tainted 4.19.25-3 #1
 Hardware name: AIC 1S-HV26-08/MB-DPSB04-06, BIOS IVYBV060 10/21/2015
 Call Trace:
  dump_stack+0x5c/0x7b
  ___might_sleep+0xec/0x110
  __flush_work+0x48/0x1f0
  ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x4d/0x80
  _cleanup_srcu_struct+0x104/0x140
  free_user+0x18/0x30 [ipmi_msghandler]
  ipmi_free_recv_msg+0x3a/0x50 [ipmi_msghandler]
  deliver_response+0xbd/0xd0 [ipmi_msghandler]
  deliver_local_response+0xe/0x30 [ipmi_msghandler]
  handle_one_recv_msg+0x163/0xc80 [ipmi_msghandler]
  ? dequeue_entity+0xa0/0x960
  handle_new_recv_msgs+0x15c/0x1f0 [ipmi_msghandler]
  tasklet_action_common.isra.22+0x103/0x120
  __do_softirq+0xf8/0x2d7
  run_ksoftirqd+0x26/0x50
  smpboot_thread_fn+0x11d/0x1e0
  kthread+0x103/0x140
  ? sort_range+0x20/0x20
  ? kthread_destroy_worker+0x40/0x40
  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40

Fixes: 77f8269606bf ("ipmi: fix use-after-free of user->release_barrier.rda")

Reported-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.0
Cc: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c |   19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -214,6 +214,9 @@ struct ipmi_user {

 	/* Does this interface receive IPMI events? */
 	bool gets_events;
+
+	/* Free must run in process context for RCU cleanup. */
+	struct work_struct remove_work;
 };

 static struct ipmi_user *acquire_ipmi_user(struct ipmi_user *user, int *index)
@@ -1079,6 +1082,15 @@ static int intf_err_seq(struct ipmi_smi
 }

+static void free_user_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct ipmi_user *user = container_of(work, struct ipmi_user,
+					      remove_work);
+
+	cleanup_srcu_struct(&user->release_barrier);
+	kfree(user);
+}
+
 int ipmi_create_user(unsigned int          if_num,
 		     const struct ipmi_user_hndl *handler,
 		     void                  *handler_data,
@@ -1122,6 +1134,8 @@ int ipmi_create_user(unsigned int
 	goto out_kfree;

  found:
+	INIT_WORK(&new_user->remove_work, free_user_work);
+
 	rv = init_srcu_struct(&new_user->release_barrier);
 	if (rv)
 		goto out_kfree;
@@ -1184,8 +1198,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmi_get_smi_info);
 static void free_user(struct kref *ref)
 {
 	struct ipmi_user *user = container_of(ref, struct ipmi_user, refcount);
-	cleanup_srcu_struct(&user->release_barrier);
-	kfree(user);
+
+	/* SRCU cleanup must happen in task context. */
+	schedule_work(&user->remove_work);
 }

 static void _ipmi_destroy_user(struct ipmi_user *user)