lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190424170928.734963793@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:08:47 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Koen De Schepper <koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
        Olivier Tilmans <olivier.tilmans@...ia-bell-labs.com>,
        Bob Briscoe <research@...briscoe.net>,
        Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Shewmaker <agshew@...il.com>,
        Glenn Judd <glenn.judd@...ganstanley.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 083/168] tcp: Ensure DCTCP reacts to losses

From: Koen De Schepper <koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>

[ Upstream commit aecfde23108b8e637d9f5c5e523b24fb97035dc3 ]

RFC8257 ยง3.5 explicitly states that "A DCTCP sender MUST react to
loss episodes in the same way as conventional TCP".

Currently, Linux DCTCP performs no cwnd reduction when losses
are encountered. Optionally, the dctcp_clamp_alpha_on_loss resets
alpha to its maximal value if a RTO happens. This behavior
is sub-optimal for at least two reasons: i) it ignores losses
triggering fast retransmissions; and ii) it causes unnecessary large
cwnd reduction in the future if the loss was isolated as it resets
the historical term of DCTCP's alpha EWMA to its maximal value (i.e.,
denoting a total congestion). The second reason has an especially
noticeable effect when using DCTCP in high BDP environments, where
alpha normally stays at low values.

This patch replace the clamping of alpha by setting ssthresh to
half of cwnd for both fast retransmissions and RTOs, at most once
per RTT. Consequently, the dctcp_clamp_alpha_on_loss module parameter
has been removed.

The table below shows experimental results where we measured the
drop probability of a PIE AQM (not applying ECN marks) at a
bottleneck in the presence of a single TCP flow with either the
alpha-clamping option enabled or the cwnd halving proposed by this
patch. Results using reno or cubic are given for comparison.

                          |  Link   |   RTT    |    Drop
                 TCP CC   |  speed  | base+AQM | probability
        ==================|=========|==========|============
                    CUBIC |  40Mbps |  7+20ms  |    0.21%
                     RENO |         |          |    0.19%
        DCTCP-CLAMP-ALPHA |         |          |   25.80%
         DCTCP-HALVE-CWND |         |          |    0.22%
        ------------------|---------|----------|------------
                    CUBIC | 100Mbps |  7+20ms  |    0.03%
                     RENO |         |          |    0.02%
        DCTCP-CLAMP-ALPHA |         |          |   23.30%
         DCTCP-HALVE-CWND |         |          |    0.04%
        ------------------|---------|----------|------------
                    CUBIC | 800Mbps |   1+1ms  |    0.04%
                     RENO |         |          |    0.05%
        DCTCP-CLAMP-ALPHA |         |          |   18.70%
         DCTCP-HALVE-CWND |         |          |    0.06%

We see that, without halving its cwnd for all source of losses,
DCTCP drives the AQM to large drop probabilities in order to keep
the queue length under control (i.e., it repeatedly faces RTOs).
Instead, if DCTCP reacts to all source of losses, it can then be
controlled by the AQM using similar drop levels than cubic or reno.

Signed-off-by: Koen De Schepper <koen.de_schepper@...ia-bell-labs.com>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Tilmans <olivier.tilmans@...ia-bell-labs.com>
Cc: Bob Briscoe <research@...briscoe.net>
Cc: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Shewmaker <agshew@...il.com>
Cc: Glenn Judd <glenn.judd@...ganstanley.com>
Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_dctcp.c
@@ -66,11 +66,6 @@ static unsigned int dctcp_alpha_on_init
 module_param(dctcp_alpha_on_init, uint, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(dctcp_alpha_on_init, "parameter for initial alpha value");
 
-static unsigned int dctcp_clamp_alpha_on_loss __read_mostly;
-module_param(dctcp_clamp_alpha_on_loss, uint, 0644);
-MODULE_PARM_DESC(dctcp_clamp_alpha_on_loss,
-		 "parameter for clamping alpha on loss");
-
 static struct tcp_congestion_ops dctcp_reno;
 
 static void dctcp_reset(const struct tcp_sock *tp, struct dctcp *ca)
@@ -211,21 +206,23 @@ static void dctcp_update_alpha(struct so
 	}
 }
 
-static void dctcp_state(struct sock *sk, u8 new_state)
+static void dctcp_react_to_loss(struct sock *sk)
 {
-	if (dctcp_clamp_alpha_on_loss && new_state == TCP_CA_Loss) {
-		struct dctcp *ca = inet_csk_ca(sk);
+	struct dctcp *ca = inet_csk_ca(sk);
+	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
 
-		/* If this extension is enabled, we clamp dctcp_alpha to
-		 * max on packet loss; the motivation is that dctcp_alpha
-		 * is an indicator to the extend of congestion and packet
-		 * loss is an indicator of extreme congestion; setting
-		 * this in practice turned out to be beneficial, and
-		 * effectively assumes total congestion which reduces the
-		 * window by half.
-		 */
-		ca->dctcp_alpha = DCTCP_MAX_ALPHA;
-	}
+	ca->loss_cwnd = tp->snd_cwnd;
+	tp->snd_ssthresh = max(tp->snd_cwnd >> 1U, 2U);
+}
+
+static void dctcp_state(struct sock *sk, u8 new_state)
+{
+	if (new_state == TCP_CA_Recovery &&
+	    new_state != inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ca_state)
+		dctcp_react_to_loss(sk);
+	/* We handle RTO in dctcp_cwnd_event to ensure that we perform only
+	 * one loss-adjustment per RTT.
+	 */
 }
 
 static void dctcp_cwnd_event(struct sock *sk, enum tcp_ca_event ev)
@@ -237,6 +234,9 @@ static void dctcp_cwnd_event(struct sock
 	case CA_EVENT_ECN_NO_CE:
 		dctcp_ce_state_1_to_0(sk);
 		break;
+	case CA_EVENT_LOSS:
+		dctcp_react_to_loss(sk);
+		break;
 	default:
 		/* Don't care for the rest. */
 		break;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ