| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:45:33 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...il.com>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>, bgodavar@...eaurora.org,
ytkim@....qualcomm.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...lessm.com,
João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Ignore CC events not matching the last HCI
command
Hi Joao Paulo,
> This commit makes the kernel not send the next queued HCI command until
> a command complete arrives for the last HCI command sent to the
> controller. This change avoids a problem with some buggy controllers
> (seen on two SKUs of QCA9377) that send an extra command complete event
> for the previous command after the kernel had already sent a new HCI
> command to the controller.
>
> The problem was reproduced when starting an active scanning procedure,
> where an extra command complete event arrives for the LE_SET_RANDOM_ADDR
> command. When this happends the kernel ends up not processing the
> command complete for the following commmand, LE_SET_SCAN_PARAM, and
> ultimately behaving as if a passive scanning procedure was being
> performed, when in fact controller is performing an active scanning
> procedure. This makes it impossible to discover BLE devices as no device
> found events are sent to userspace.
>
> This problem is reproducible on 100% of the attempts on the affected
> controllers. The extra command complete event can be seen at timestamp
> 27.420131 on the btmon logs bellow.
>
> Bluetooth monitor ver 5.50
> = Note: Linux version 5.0.0+ (x86_64) 0.352340
> = Note: Bluetooth subsystem version 2.22 0.352343
> = New Index: 80:C5:F2:8F:87:84 (Primary,USB,hci0) [hci0] 0.352344
> = Open Index: 80:C5:F2:8F:87:84 [hci0] 0.352345
> = Index Info: 80:C5:F2:8F:87:84 (Qualcomm) [hci0] 0.352346
> @ MGMT Open: bluetoothd (privileged) version 1.14 {0x0001} 0.352347
> @ MGMT Open: btmon (privileged) version 1.14 {0x0002} 0.352366
> @ MGMT Open: btmgmt (privileged) version 1.14 {0x0003} 27.302164
> @ MGMT Command: Start Discovery (0x0023) plen 1 {0x0003} [hci0] 27.302310
> Address type: 0x06
> LE Public
> LE Random
> < HCI Command: LE Set Random Address (0x08|0x0005) plen 6 #1 [hci0] 27.302496
> Address: 15:60:F2:91:B2:24 (Non-Resolvable)
>> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 4 #2 [hci0] 27.419117
> LE Set Random Address (0x08|0x0005) ncmd 1
> Status: Success (0x00)
> < HCI Command: LE Set Scan Parameters (0x08|0x000b) plen 7 #3 [hci0] 27.419244
> Type: Active (0x01)
> Interval: 11.250 msec (0x0012)
> Window: 11.250 msec (0x0012)
> Own address type: Random (0x01)
> Filter policy: Accept all advertisement (0x00)
>> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 4 #4 [hci0] 27.420131
> LE Set Random Address (0x08|0x0005) ncmd 1
> Status: Success (0x00)
> < HCI Command: LE Set Scan Enable (0x08|0x000c) plen 2 #5 [hci0] 27.420259
> Scanning: Enabled (0x01)
> Filter duplicates: Enabled (0x01)
>> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 4 #6 [hci0] 27.420969
> LE Set Scan Parameters (0x08|0x000b) ncmd 1
> Status: Success (0x00)
>> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 4 #7 [hci0] 27.421983
> LE Set Scan Enable (0x08|0x000c) ncmd 1
> Status: Success (0x00)
> @ MGMT Event: Command Complete (0x0001) plen 4 {0x0003} [hci0] 27.422059
> Start Discovery (0x0023) plen 1
> Status: Success (0x00)
> Address type: 0x06
> LE Public
> LE Random
> @ MGMT Event: Discovering (0x0013) plen 2 {0x0003} [hci0] 27.422067
> Address type: 0x06
> LE Public
> LE Random
> Discovery: Enabled (0x01)
> @ MGMT Event: Discovering (0x0013) plen 2 {0x0002} [hci0] 27.422067
> Address type: 0x06
> LE Public
> LE Random
> Discovery: Enabled (0x01)
> @ MGMT Event: Discovering (0x0013) plen 2 {0x0001} [hci0] 27.422067
> Address type: 0x06
> LE Public
> LE Random
> Discovery: Enabled (0x01)
>
> Signed-off-by: João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...lessm.com>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> index 609fd6871c5a..b349fc2b4123 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> @@ -3071,6 +3071,19 @@ static void hci_cmd_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb,
> *opcode = __le16_to_cpu(ev->opcode);
> *status = skb->data[sizeof(*ev)];
>
> + if (*opcode != HCI_OP_RESET && !hci_sent_cmd_data(hdev, *opcode)) {
> + /* Some buggy controllers generate an extra command complete
> + * event for the previous command after a new commend was
> + * already sent, so if the opcode does not match the last sent
> + * command we should ignore this event.
> + *
> + * HCI_OP_RESET is a special case handled in
> + * hci_req_cmd_complete.
> + */
> + bt_dev_err(hdev, "unexpected CC event opcode 0x%4.4x", *opcode);
> + return;
> + }
> +
the return; here is not going to fly. You need to go through the switch statement since it actually does bookkeeping for a lot of features even if the command is not executed by hci_req and instead comes from user space or someone else.
What is the problem with handling this in hci_req_cmd_complete. We have hci_sent_cmd_data check there already. Lets extend this to ensure that command complete for random commands don’t trigger us to continue with the request.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists