[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424205150.GA4582@amd>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 22:51:50 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, lduncan@...e.com, hare@...e.com,
mcgrof@...nel.org, jthumshirn@...e.de, hch@....de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
bvanassche@....org
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regression -next -- scsi: sd: Rely on the driver core for
asynchronous probing was Re: next-20190408..0418: Suspend/resume problems on
Thinkpad X60
On Wed 2019-04-24 22:48:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Not block, but it seems scsi subsystem is:
>
> commit 21e6ba3f0e0257cce1a226c1f15e0a8ba4338ca3
> Author: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
> Date: Wed Mar 20 13:09:19 2019 -0700
>
> scsi: sd: Rely on the driver core for asynchronous probing
>
> As explained during the 2018 LSF/MM session about increasing SCSI
> disk
> probing concurrency, the problems with the current probing
> approach are as
>
> Seems to be responsible. Full log attached.
Unfortunately, that one does not revert cleanly on top of -next.
Any ideas what is wrong?
Does suspend/resume work for you?
I can test patches.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists