lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ad3c587-6ab8-1307-5a13-a3e73cf569a5@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 22:55:30 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, jmorris@...ei.org,
        sashal@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        keith.busch@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
        dave.jiang@...el.com, zwisler@...nel.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        ying.huang@...el.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com, bp@...e.de,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com, tiwai@...e.de,
        jglisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [v2 2/2] device-dax: "Hotremove" persistent memory that is used
 like normal RAM

On 21.04.19 03:44, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> It is now allowed to use persistent memory like a regular RAM, but
> currently there is no way to remove this memory until machine is
> rebooted.
> 
> This work expands the functionality to also allows hotremoving
> previously hotplugged persistent memory, and recover the device for use
> for other purposes.
> 
> To hotremove persistent memory, the management software must first
> offline all memory blocks of dax region, and than unbind it from
> device-dax/kmem driver. So, operations should look like this:
> 
> echo offline > echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryN/state
> ...
> echo dax0.0 > /sys/bus/dax/drivers/kmem/unbind
> 
> Note: if unbind is done without offlining memory beforehand, it won't be
> possible to do dax0.0 hotremove, and dax's memory is going to be part of
> System RAM until reboot.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dax/dax-private.h |  2 +
>  drivers/dax/kmem.c        | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/dax-private.h b/drivers/dax/dax-private.h
> index a45612148ca0..999aaf3a29b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/dax-private.h
> +++ b/drivers/dax/dax-private.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ struct dax_region {
>   * @pgmap - pgmap for memmap setup / lifetime (driver owned)
>   * @ref: pgmap reference count (driver owned)
>   * @cmp: @ref final put completion (driver owned)
> + * @dax_mem_res: physical address range of hotadded DAX memory
>   */
>  struct dev_dax {
>  	struct dax_region *region;
> @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ struct dev_dax {
>  	struct dev_pagemap pgmap;
>  	struct percpu_ref ref;
>  	struct completion cmp;
> +	struct resource *dax_kmem_res;
>  };
>  
>  static inline struct dev_dax *to_dev_dax(struct device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> index 4c0131857133..d4896b281036 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
> @@ -71,21 +71,104 @@ int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
>  		kfree(new_res);
>  		return rc;
>  	}
> +	dev_dax->dax_kmem_res = new_res;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> +/*
> + * Check that device-dax's memory_blocks are offline. If a memory_block is not
> + * offline a warning is printed and an error is returned. dax hotremove can
> + * succeed only when every memory_block is offlined beforehand.
> + */
> +static int
> +offline_memblock_cb(struct memory_block *mem, void *arg)

Function name suggests that you are actually trying to offline memory
here. Maybe check_memblocks_offline_cb(), just like we have in
mm/memory_hotplug.c.

> +{
> +	struct device *mem_dev = &mem->dev;
> +	bool is_offline;
> +
> +	device_lock(mem_dev);
> +	is_offline = mem_dev->offline;
> +	device_unlock(mem_dev);
> +
> +	if (!is_offline) {
> +		struct device *dev = (struct device *)arg;
> +		unsigned long spfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr);
> +		unsigned long epfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->end_section_nr);
> +		phys_addr_t spa = spfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		phys_addr_t epa = epfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +		dev_warn(dev, "memory block [%pa-%pa] is not offline\n",
> +			 &spa, &epa);
> +
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct dev_dax *dev_dax = to_dev_dax(dev);
> +	struct resource *res = dev_dax->dax_kmem_res;
> +	resource_size_t kmem_start;
> +	resource_size_t kmem_size;
> +	unsigned long start_pfn;
> +	unsigned long end_pfn;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * dax kmem resource does not exist, means memory was never hotplugged.
> +	 * So, nothing to do here.
> +	 */
> +	if (!res)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	kmem_start = res->start;
> +	kmem_size = resource_size(res);
> +	start_pfn = kmem_start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	end_pfn = start_pfn + (kmem_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Walk and check that every singe memory_block of dax region is
> +	 * offline
> +	 */
> +	lock_device_hotplug();
> +	rc = walk_memory_range(start_pfn, end_pfn, dev, offline_memblock_cb);
> +	unlock_device_hotplug();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If admin has not offlined memory beforehand, we cannot hotremove dax.
> +	 * Unfortunately, because unbind will still succeed there is no way for
> +	 * user to hotremove dax after this.
> +	 */
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;

Can't it happen that there is a race between you checking if memory is
offline and an admin onlining memory again? maybe pull the
remove_memory() into the locked region, using __remove_memory() instead.

> +
> +	/* Hotremove memory, cannot fail because memory is already offlined */
> +	remove_memory(dev_dax->target_node, kmem_start, kmem_size);
> +
> +	/* Release and free dax resources */
> +	release_resource(res);
> +	kfree(res);
> +	dev_dax->dax_kmem_res = NULL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#else
>  static int dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	/*
> -	 * Purposely leak the request_mem_region() for the device-dax
> -	 * range and return '0' to ->remove() attempts. The removal of
> -	 * the device from the driver always succeeds, but the region
> -	 * is permanently pinned as reserved by the unreleased
> +	 * Without hotremove purposely leak the request_mem_region() for the
> +	 * device-dax range and return '0' to ->remove() attempts. The removal
> +	 * of the device from the driver always succeeds, but the region is
> +	 * permanently pinned as reserved by the unreleased
>  	 * request_mem_region().
>  	 */
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
>  
>  static struct dax_device_driver device_dax_kmem_driver = {
>  	.drv = {
> 


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ