[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424211536.GB27952@ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 23:15:36 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Xu YiPing <xuyiping@...ilicon.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Xinliang Liu <z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com>,
Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
Rongrong Zou <zourongrong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/25] drm: kirin: Pass driver data to crtc init and
plane init
Hi John.
>
> > I missed where ade_driver_data came from.
> > This looks an extra patch to intoduce driver_data,
> > that maybe should be merged with an earlier version?
>
> I'm not sure I'm following you here. Can you clarify a bit more?
So I looked at this a bit more - and got the bigger picture in place
again.
driver_data is assigned using the lookup done at probe() time.
For now this is just assigned to ade_driver_data as this is the
only option.
So an indirection via driver_date or calling ade_driver_data
direct is the same.
And you have several patches where you migrate to use driver_data
rather than calling ade_driver_data direct.
It confused me that the patch introducing the lookup at probe()
came before all call sites were migrated to use driver_data.
But I get it now so it is fine.
Maybe a few words in the commit log like:
This patch refactor to call functions via driver_data,
rather than hardcoding them via ade_driver_data.
This is doen so we later can assing another stucture to
driver_data to support other chips.
PS. I did not complain about your spelling mistakes in the
changelog. I have a similar (or worse) keyboard from a spelling
point of view.
Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists