[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424004131.GA19764@altlinux.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 03:41:31 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arch: add pidfd and io_uring syscalls everywhere
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 09:28:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The following changes since commit 9e98c678c2d6ae3a17cb2de55d17f69dddaa231b:
>
> Linux 5.1-rc1 (2019-03-17 14:22:26 -0700)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic.git
> syscalls-5.1
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 39036cd2727395c3369b1051005da74059a85317:
>
> arch: add pidfd and io_uring syscalls everywhere (2019-04-15 16:31:17 +0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> arch: add pidfd and io_uring syscalls everywhere
>
> This comes a bit late, but should be in 5.1 anyway: we want the newly
> added system calls to be synchronized across all architectures in
> the release.
>
> I hope that in the future, any newly added system calls can be added
> to all architectures at the same time, and tested there while they
> are in linux-next, avoiding dependencies between the architecture
> maintainer trees and the tree that contains the new system call.
Is "everywhere" really means everywhere?
The reason I'm asking this question is that sh64 seems to be excluded:
arch/sh/kernel/syscalls_64.S hasn't got any syscall entries since commit
v4.8-rc1~15^2~3. Is sh64 supported in any way at all?
--
ldv
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists