linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 05/19] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: use local var dev in probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:20:12 +0300
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/19] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: use local var dev
 in probe



On 23.04.19 21:40, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 04:08:56PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Use local variable struct device *dev in probe to simplify code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index 13a339c64892..0b8cc4e6d9cd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -3458,6 +3458,7 @@ static const struct soc_device_attribute cpsw_soc_devices[] = {
>>  
>>  static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>  	struct clk			*clk;
>>  	struct cpsw_platform_data	*data;
>>  	struct net_device		*ndev;
> 
> It seems odd not to keep with the column layout?
> Plus it would make it reverse Christmas tree.

It's has never been optimized for Christmas tree and
I'll keep cur layout for now.

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii