[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424100004.GJ3584@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:00:04 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: j-nomura@...jp.nec.com, kasong@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] x86/boot: Use efi_setup_data for searching RSDP
on kexec-ed kernel
On 04/24/19 at 11:38am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 05:29:42PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > In this series, patch 2/2 has dependency on patch 1/1, otherwise
> > it may cause system to reset to firmware on some machines.
> >
> > The patch 2/2 is the version Boris organized:
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190416095209.GG27892@zn.tnic
> >
> > Patch 1/1 is based on Kairui's v1 patch, and add ACPI tables mapping:
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190422092804.15534-1-kasong@redhat.com
> >
> > Dave Young confirmed this patchset passed test on his t420 laptop, where
> > the system resetting issue caused by patch 2/2 was found.
>
> I guess but this does not give me the warm and fuzzy feeling one week
> before the merge window.
>
> So:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/tip/36f0c423552dacaca152324b8e9bda42a6d88865
>
> and we all can relax ourselves and take the next release cycle to test
> the hell out of this before reenabling it again.
OK, then let's hold till the next window opening.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists