linux-kernel - [PATCH 10/28] locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() and check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190424101934.51535-11-duyuyang@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:19:16 +0800
From:   Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
To:     peterz@...radead.org, will.deacon@....com, mingo@...nel.org
Cc:     bvanassche@....org, ming.lei@...hat.com, frederic@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/28] locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() and check_deadlock()

The lockdep_map argument in them is not used, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 3a2b0da..ec4043b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -2128,8 +2128,7 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
  * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
  */
 static int
-check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next,
-	       struct lockdep_map *next_instance, int read)
+check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next, int read)
 {
 	struct held_lock *prev;
 	struct held_lock *nest = NULL;
@@ -2279,7 +2278,6 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-
 	if (!save_trace(&trace))
 		return 0;
 
@@ -2679,8 +2677,9 @@ static inline int lookup_chain_cache_add(struct task_struct *curr,
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
-		struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
+static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
+			  struct held_lock *hlock,
+			  int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
@@ -2706,7 +2705,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
 		 * any of these scenarios could lead to a deadlock. If
 		 * All validations
 		 */
-		int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, lock, hlock->read);
+		int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, hlock->read);
 
 		if (!ret)
 			return 0;
@@ -2737,8 +2736,8 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
 }
 #else
 static inline int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
-	       	struct lockdep_map *lock, struct held_lock *hlock,
-		int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
+				 struct held_lock *hlock,
+				 int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
 {
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -3720,7 +3719,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(!hlock_class(hlock)->key);
 	}
 
-	if (!validate_chain(curr, lock, hlock, chain_head, chain_key))
+	if (!validate_chain(curr, hlock, chain_head, chain_key))
 		return 0;
 
 	curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key;
-- 
1.8.3.1