[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424103155.GA9642@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:31:55 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/percpu-rwsem: Add DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(), use it
to initialize cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> Turn DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM() into __DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM() with the
> additional "is_static" argument to introduce DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM().
>
> Change cgroup.c to use DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem).
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h | 8 ++++++--
> kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
> index 6887636..2809b44 100644
> --- a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
> @@ -17,14 +17,18 @@ struct percpu_rw_semaphore {
> int readers_block;
> };
>
> -#define DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM(name) \
> +#define __DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(name, is_static) \
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, __percpu_rwsem_rc_##name); \
> -static struct percpu_rw_semaphore name = { \
> +is_static struct percpu_rw_semaphore name = { \
> .rss = __RCU_SYNC_INITIALIZER(name.rss), \
> .read_count = &__percpu_rwsem_rc_##name, \
> .rw_sem = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name.rw_sem), \
> .writer = __RCUWAIT_INITIALIZER(name.writer), \
> }
> +#define DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(name) \
> + __DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(name, /* not static */)
> +#define DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM(name) \
> + __DEFINE_PERCPU_RWSEM(name, static)
Which tree is this against? It doesn't apply to tip:master nor latest
-git.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists