linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45f1305e2ea62ca76a86c6cca1693c20d3a0c891.camel@vmware.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 01:31:59 +0000
From:   Deepak Singh Rawat <drawat@...are.com>
To:     "sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:     "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "airlied@...ux.ie" <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the drm tree

On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 11:12 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Deepak,
> 
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:36:19 +0000 Deepak Singh Rawat <
> drawat@...are.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 10:22 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > Commit
> > > 
> > >   a9f58c456e9d ("drm/vmwgfx: Be more restrictive when dirtying
> > > resources")  
> > 
> > Actully the Signed-off-by: is not missing see 
> > 
> > 
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx?id=a9f58c456e9dde6f272e7be4d6bed607fd7008aa
> 
> There is no Signed-off-by from you as the committer (just a
> Reviewed-by from you and a Signed-off-by from the author).

Sorry missed that part and missed your email context about commiter and
not the author. I think at this point nothing can be done?

> 
> > By the way there is the patter "---" before Signed-off-by:(which is
> > same as used by patch to separate description from code) and I
> > think
> > the script is reading only till that point. I think "---" should
> > not be
> > used in patch description.
> 
> All the tags should be *before* the "-- " or "---" separator.
>