[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424125212.GN12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:52:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] perf/x86: make perf callchain work without
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 08:42:40AM -0400, Kairui Song wrote:
> Sure, the updated comments looks much better. Will the maintainer
> squash the comment update or should I send a V5?
I've squashed it, I've just not gotten around to stuffing it a git tree
yet. Should happen 'soon'.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists