lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:28:46 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        rpjday@...shcourse.ca, dvhart@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mod_devicetable: helper macro for declaring oftree
 module device table

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 01:08:01PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> Little helper macro that declares an oftree module device table,
> if CONFIG_OF is enabled. Otherwise it's just noop.
> 
> This is also helpful if some drivers can be built w/ or w/o
> oftree support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@...ux.net>

As I said before, please drop all "non-name" information from your s-o-b
line.



> ---
>  include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> index 448621c..853e301 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> @@ -245,6 +245,15 @@ struct of_device_id {
>  	const void *data;
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * macro for adding the of module device table only if CONFIG_OF enabled
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +#define MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE_OF(name)	MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of,name)
> +#else
> +#define MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE_OF(name)
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */

Do you have a real user of this?  We need that for any type of apis that
people are supposed to use, we do not just add them without users if at
all possible.

And did you run it through checkpatch.pl before sending this?  :(

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ