[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424135524.GE6661@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:55:24 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
To: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, salil.mehta@...wei.com,
yisen.zhuang@...wei.com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 08/12] net: hns3: stop schedule reset service
while unloading driver
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 07:05:27PM +0800, Huazhong Tan wrote:
> This patch uses HCLGE_STATE_REMOVING/HCLGEVF_STATE_REMOVING flag to
> indicate that the driver is unloading, and we should stop new coming
> reset service to be scheduled, otherwise, reset service will access
> some resource which has been freed by unloading.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan <tanhuazhong@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
> ---
> V1->V2: fixes a flag setting error
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_main.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_main.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c
> index 4d5568e..ead8308 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c
> @@ -2175,7 +2175,8 @@ static void hclge_mbx_task_schedule(struct hclge_dev *hdev)
>
> static void hclge_reset_task_schedule(struct hclge_dev *hdev)
> {
> - if (!test_and_set_bit(HCLGE_STATE_RST_SERVICE_SCHED, &hdev->state))
> + if (!test_bit(HCLGE_STATE_REMOVING, &hdev->state) &&
> + !test_and_set_bit(HCLGE_STATE_RST_SERVICE_SCHED, &hdev->state))
> schedule_work(&hdev->rst_service_task);
> }
>
In what use case do you need an extra bit for this? From my read, this work
task only gets scheduled from:
1) Interrupt handlers
2) Its own service task
Based on the fact that you are calling cancel_work_sync(...rst_service_task)
from the pci teardown routine, irqs should all be disabled on your devices
already (meaning interrupts shouldn't schedule it), and cancel_work_sync
guarantees that rearming cant happen from within its own service task.
Neil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists