linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] tools: memory-model: Prepare for data-race detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1904241023380.1443-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:24:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
cc:     LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
        Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tools: memory-model: Prepare for data-race detection

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:17:45PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > This patch makes some slight alterations to linux-kernel.cat in
> > preparation for adding support for data-race detection to the
> > Linux-Kernel Memory Model.
> > 
> > 	The definitions of relations involved in Acquire, Release, and
> > 	unlock-lock ordering are moved up earlier in the source file.
> > 
> > 	The rmb relation is factored through the new R4rmb class: the
> > 	class of reads to which rmb will apply.
> > 
> > 	The definition of the fence relation is moved earlier, and it
> > 	is split up into read- and write-fences (rmb and wmb) and all
> > 	the others.
> > 
> > This should not make any functional changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> 
> Thank you, Alan, I have queued all three onto -rcu for review and testing.
> FYI, I rebased my smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic() patch on top of yours
> to avoid the conflict.
> 
> Which demonstrates non-commutativity of patches.  Your patches conflict
> with mine, but mine does not conflict with yours.  ;-)

:-)

Besides, who knows where we'll end up with the 
smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic stuff once Peter is done with it, anyway?

Alan