lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190424143911.28890-22-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:38:40 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 22/52] net: stmmac: don't overwrite discard_frame status

From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>

[ Upstream commit 1b746ce8b397e58f9e40ce5c63b7198de6930482 ]

If we have error bits set, the discard_frame status will get overwritten
by checksum bit checks, which might set the status back to good one.
Fix by checking the COE status only if the frame is good.

Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/enh_desc.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/enh_desc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/enh_desc.c
index e8855e6adb48..c42ef6c729c0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/enh_desc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/enh_desc.c
@@ -231,9 +231,10 @@ static int enh_desc_get_rx_status(void *data, struct stmmac_extra_stats *x,
 	 * It doesn't match with the information reported into the databook.
 	 * At any rate, we need to understand if the CSUM hw computation is ok
 	 * and report this info to the upper layers. */
-	ret = enh_desc_coe_rdes0(!!(rdes0 & RDES0_IPC_CSUM_ERROR),
-				 !!(rdes0 & RDES0_FRAME_TYPE),
-				 !!(rdes0 & ERDES0_RX_MAC_ADDR));
+	if (likely(ret == good_frame))
+		ret = enh_desc_coe_rdes0(!!(rdes0 & RDES0_IPC_CSUM_ERROR),
+					 !!(rdes0 & RDES0_FRAME_TYPE),
+					 !!(rdes0 & ERDES0_RX_MAC_ADDR));
 
 	if (unlikely(rdes0 & RDES0_DRIBBLING))
 		x->dribbling_bit++;
-- 
2.19.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ