[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190424145505.GE14798@kadam>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:55:05 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Bo YU <tsu.yubo@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, christian.gromm@...rochip.com,
colin.king@...onical.com, andrey.shvetsov@....de,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: most: protect potential string overflow
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:20:18PM -0400, Bo YU wrote:
> There maybe cause potential string overflow issue due to use
> strcpy without checking the length
>
> Detected By CoversityScan CID# 1444760
>
> Fixes: 131ac62253dba:(staging: most: core: use device description as name)
It doesn't really fix anything, it just silences a static checker
warning.
> Signed-off-by: Bo YU <tsu.yubo@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/most/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/core.c b/drivers/staging/most/core.c
> index 956daf8c3bd2..0f26cebac91a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/most/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/most/core.c
> @@ -1431,7 +1431,7 @@ int most_register_interface(struct most_interface *iface)
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iface->p->channel_list);
> iface->p->dev_id = id;
> - strcpy(iface->p->name, iface->description);
> + strlcpy(iface->p->name, iface->description, sizeof(iface->p->name));
We prefer strscpy() more than strlcpy() these days.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists