[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190425194837.GB58719@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:48:37 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm/tlb: Remove flush_tlb_info from the stack
* Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:29 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > * Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Move flush_tlb_info variables off the stack. This allows to align
> >> flush_tlb_info to cache-line and avoid potentially unnecessary cache
> >> line movements. It also allows to have a fixed virtual-to-physical
> >> translation of the variables, which reduces TLB misses.
> >>
> >> Use per-CPU struct for flush_tlb_mm_range() and
> >> flush_tlb_kernel_range(). Add debug assertions to ensure there are
> >> no nested TLB flushes that might overwrite the per-CPU data. For
> >> arch_tlbbatch_flush() use a const struct.
> >>
> >> Results when running a microbenchmarks that performs 10^6 MADV_DONTEED
> >> operations and touching a page, in which 3 additional threads run a
> >> busy-wait loop (5 runs, PTI and retpolines are turned off):
> >>
> >> base off-stack
> >> ---- ---------
> >> avg (usec/op) 1.629 1.570 (-3%)
> >> stddev 0.014 0.009
> >>
> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> >> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> >> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> >> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v1->v2:
> >> - Initialize all flush_tlb_info fields [Andy]
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> >> index 487b8474c01c..aac191eb2b90 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> >> @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ static void flush_tlb_func_common(const struct flush_tlb_info *f,
> >> this_cpu_write(cpu_tlbstate.ctxs[loaded_mm_asid].tlb_gen, mm_tlb_gen);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void flush_tlb_func_local(void *info, enum tlb_flush_reason reason)
> >> +static void flush_tlb_func_local(const void *info, enum tlb_flush_reason reason)
> >> {
> >> const struct flush_tlb_info *f = info;
> >>
> >> @@ -722,43 +722,81 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> >> */
> >> unsigned long tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling __read_mostly = 33;
> >>
> >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct flush_tlb_info, flush_tlb_info);
> >> +
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> >> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, flush_tlb_info_idx);
> >> +#endif
> >> +
> >> +static inline struct flush_tlb_info *get_flush_tlb_info(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> >> + unsigned int stride_shift, bool freed_tables,
> >> + u64 new_tlb_gen)
> >> +{
> >> + struct flush_tlb_info *info = this_cpu_ptr(&flush_tlb_info);
> >> +
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> >> + /*
> >> + * Ensure that the following code is non-reentrant and flush_tlb_info
> >> + * is not overwritten. This means no TLB flushing is initiated by
> >> + * interrupt handlers and machine-check exception handlers.
> >> + */
> >> + BUG_ON(this_cpu_inc_return(flush_tlb_info_idx) != 1);
> >> +#endif
> >
> > isn't this effectively VM_BUG_ON()?
>
> Not exactly. When CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is off we get
>
> #define VM_BUG_ON(cond) BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(cond)
>
> This will cause the build to fail since flush_tlb_info_idx is not defined in
> when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is off.
Ugh, so VM_BUG_ON() should really be named VM_BUILD_BUG_ON()?
Anyway, agreed.
> >> +static inline void put_flush_tlb_info(void)
> >> +{
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> >> + /* Complete reentrency prevention checks */
> >> + barrier();
> >> + this_cpu_dec(flush_tlb_info_idx);
> >> +#endif
> >
> > In principle this_cpu_dec() should imply a compiler barrier?
>
> this_cpu_dec() is eventually expanded to the macro of percpu_add_op(). And
> the inline assembly does not have a “memory” clobber, so I don’t think so.
I think that's a bug and PeterZ is fixing those.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists