linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 26/28] locking/lockdep: Remove _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190425200658.GZ12232@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 25 Apr 2019 22:06:58 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Yuyang Du <duyuyang@...il.com>
Cc:     will.deacon@....com, mingo@...nel.org, bvanassche@....org,
        ming.lei@...hat.com, frederic@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/28] locking/lockdep: Remove __bfs

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 06:19:32PM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> Since there is no need for backward dependecy searching, remove this
> extra function layer.

OK, so $subject confused the heck out of me, I thought you were going to
remove the whole bfs machinery. May I suggest retaining
__bfs_backwards() in the previous patch (which I'm _waay_ to tired for
to look at now) and calling this patch: "Remove __bfs_backwards()".