linux-kernel - Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] NUMA, memory hierarchy and device memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190425201623.GB6391@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:16:24 -0400
From:   Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
To:     lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Paul Blinzer <Paul.Blinzer@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] NUMA, memory hierarchy and device memory


I see that the schedule is not full yet for the mm track and i would
really like to be able to have a discussion on this topic

Schedule:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Z1pDL-XeUT1ZwMWrBL8T8q3vtSqZpLPgF3Bzu_jejfk/edit#gid=0


On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:45:13PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Hi, i would like to discuss about NUMA API and its short comings when
> it comes to memory hierarchy (from fast HBM, to slower persistent
> memory through regular memory) and also device memory (which can have
> its own hierarchy).
> 
> I have proposed a patch to add a new memory topology model to the
> kernel for application to be able to get that informations, it
> also included a set of new API to bind/migrate process range [1].
> Note that this model also support device memory.
> 
> So far device memory support is achieve through device specific ioctl
> and this forbid some scenario like device memory interleaving accross
> multiple devices for a range. It also make the whole userspace more
> complex as program have to mix and match multiple device specific API
> on top of NUMA API.
> 
> While memory hierarchy can be more or less expose through the existing
> NUMA API by creating node for non-regular memory [2], i do not see this
> as a satisfying solution. Moreover such scheme does not work for device
> memory that might not even be accessible by CPUs.
> 
> 
> Hence i would like to discuss few points:
>     - What proof people wants to see this as problem we need to solve ?
>     - How to build concensus to move forward on this ?
>     - What kind of syscall API people would like to see ?
> 
> People to discuss this topic:
>     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
>     Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>
>     John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
>     Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
>     Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
>     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
>     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
>     Paul Blinzer <Paul.Blinzer@....com>
> 
> Probably others, sorry if i miss anyone from previous discussions.
> 
> Cheers,
> Jérôme
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/3/1072
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/10/1112
>