[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <155622724107.15276.12946928869888731656@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:20:41 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] clk: at91: add sam9x60 pmc driver
Quoting Alexandre Belloni (2019-04-25 14:10:09)
> On 25/04/2019 13:58:10-0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > IIRC two clocks are used by the clocksource and having it as a platform
> > > device make the clocksource driver fail with -EPROBE_DEFER.
> > >
> >
> > Ok. I'll add a comment in the driver. It needs to be
> > CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER() because it's used somewhere else too? Or it can
> > be CLK_OF_DECLARE() instead?
>
> It is coming from that comment:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/153573753043.93865.2420370848457480370@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com/
>
> Maybe I misinterpreted it.
>
Hmm I was just confused it seems. If you don't have two devices probing
the same DT node with this compatible string then I think it can just be
CLK_OF_DECLARE(). I was thinking that you were running into some sort of
issue where the other driver using this same compatible couldn't probe.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists