lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:18:58 -0700
From:   James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     prsriva <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@...il.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        inux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, vgoyal@...hat.com,
        Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the
 call generic

On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 08:34 +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:19 AM prsriva <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.c
> > om> wrote:
> > > 
> > > I will fix the comments and send out the patchset with a cover
> > > letter. Thankyou for pointing this out.
> > 
> > Please trim the emails you reply to rather than quoting everything.
> > 
> > But the real reason I'm reacting to this email is because it was
> > marked as spam, because your SMTP setup is incorrect, and you don't
> > go through the proper MS SMTP server. As a result, you don't get
> > the proper DKIM signature for verification of the microsoft.com
> > email address, and sane email clients will mark your emails as
> > spam.
> > 
> > Please fix.
> 
> It's the correct SMTP server for linux.microsoft.com.
> 
> linux.microsoft.com.	3600	IN	TXT	"v=spf1
> ip4:13.77.154.182 -all"
> linux.microsoft.com.	3600	IN	TXT	"v=DMARC
> 1;p=none;pct=100;rua=mailto:jamorris@...rosoft.com"

That's not the correct location: DMARC records should be at the _dmarc.
subdomain.  without this you'll inherit the dmarc policy of
_dmarc.microsoft.com

> We don't have DKIM set up yet.

If you advertise DMARC, you're expected to have DKIM working for spam
purposes.  On the other hand, if you don't advertise DMARC, google will
probably still bin all your email as spam.

James

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ