[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jTRF1wvcYTxfSd59ByhnzXdLL8CVg1qnUfQhAj1L1qLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:14:07 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Raju P . L . S . S . S . N" <rplsssn@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Improve support for CPUs in genpd
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:11 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 11:56, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Recently genpd was extended to cope with devices belonging to CPUs. However,
> > > attaching CPU devices via genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id|name() doesn't work,
> > > because of the virtual device that genpd allocates in this path.
> > >
> > > In this series, this limitation is addressed, together with a few other related
> > > fixes/cleanups.
> > >
> > > Ulf Hansson (4):
> > > PM / Domains: Use the base device for
> > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state()
> > > PM / Domains: Drop unused in-parameter to some genpd functions
> > > PM / Domains: Search for the CPU device outside the genpd lock
> > > PM / Domains: Allow to attach a CPU via
> > > genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id|name()
> > >
> > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
> > Are there any dependencies between this and the series you've recently posted?
>
> Yep. I should have stated that, sorry. This should be applied on top.
On top of which series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists