[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jQFXpHmpxSYSUxwGkMV98g3S+zV1oh1RYxvkebmzT29Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:29:13 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Andy Tang <andy.tang@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] clk: qoriq: Add clockgen support for lx2160a
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:15 PM Andy Tang <andy.tang@....com> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> > Sent: 2019年4月25日 18:04
> > To: Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@....com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-clk@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; sboyd@...nel.org; mturquette@...libre.com;
> > rjw@...ysocki.net; viresh.kumar@...aro.org; Yogesh Narayan Gaur
> > <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>; Andy Tang <andy.tang@....com>
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] clk: qoriq: Add clockgen support for lx2160a
> >
> > Caution: EXT Email
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:48 AM Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@....com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
> > >
> > > Add clockgen support for lx2160a.
> > > Added entry for compat 'fsl,lx2160a-clockgen'.
> >
> > Well, if I'm expected to apply this, the above is a bit terse.
> >
> > It looks like the patch makes the qoriq-cpufreq driver handle some new
> > hardware, but the changelog doesn't say much about that.
> >
> > I'm guessing that the clockgen support added here makes it possible for
> > qoriq-cpufreq to handle this chip, is that correct?
> Yes, your guess is correct. The cpufreq feature is based on clock driver.
> It should had been separated to two patches and reduced the confuse.
> Do I need to update the commit message or you just take it?
Please update the commit message.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists