| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:40:47 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Long Cheng <long.cheng@...iatek.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Peter Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
Zhenbao Liu <zhenbao.liu@...iatek.com>,
Changqi Hu <changqi.hu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: 8250-mtk: add follow control
On 25/04/2019 10:41, Long Cheng wrote:
> Add SW and HW follow control function.
Can you please explain a bit more what you are doing in this patch.
You change the setting of the registers for different baud rates. Please
elaborate what is happening there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Long Cheng <long.cheng@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
> index c1fdbc0..959fd85 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
> @@ -21,12 +21,14 @@
>
> #include "8250.h"
>
> -#define UART_MTK_HIGHS 0x09 /* Highspeed register */
> -#define UART_MTK_SAMPLE_COUNT 0x0a /* Sample count register */
> -#define UART_MTK_SAMPLE_POINT 0x0b /* Sample point register */
> +#define MTK_UART_HIGHS 0x09 /* Highspeed register */
> +#define MTK_UART_SAMPLE_COUNT 0x0a /* Sample count register */
> +#define MTK_UART_SAMPLE_POINT 0x0b /* Sample point register */
Rename looks good to me. But I'd prefer to have it in a separate patch.
> #define MTK_UART_RATE_FIX 0x0d /* UART Rate Fix Register */
> -
> #define MTK_UART_DMA_EN 0x13 /* DMA Enable register */
> +#define MTK_UART_RXTRI_AD 0x14 /* RX Trigger address */
> +#define MTK_UART_FRACDIV_L 0x15 /* Fractional divider LSB address */
> +#define MTK_UART_FRACDIV_M 0x16 /* Fractional divider MSB address */
> #define MTK_UART_DMA_EN_TX 0x2
> #define MTK_UART_DMA_EN_RX 0x5
>
> @@ -46,6 +48,7 @@ enum dma_rx_status {
> struct mtk8250_data {
> int line;
> unsigned int rx_pos;
> + unsigned int clk_count;
What is that for, not used in this patch.
> struct clk *uart_clk;
> struct clk *bus_clk;
> struct uart_8250_dma *dma;
> @@ -196,9 +199,15 @@ static void mtk8250_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> mtk8250_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
> struct ktermios *old)
> {
> + unsigned short fraction_L_mapping[] = {
> + 0, 1, 0x5, 0x15, 0x55, 0x57, 0x57, 0x77, 0x7F, 0xFF, 0xFF
> + };
> + unsigned short fraction_M_mapping[] = {
> + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3
> + };
> struct uart_8250_port *up = up_to_u8250p(port);
> + unsigned int baud, quot, fraction;
> unsigned long flags;
> - unsigned int baud, quot;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DMA
> if (up->dma) {
> @@ -214,7 +223,7 @@ static void mtk8250_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> serial8250_do_set_termios(port, termios, old);
>
> /*
> - * Mediatek UARTs use an extra highspeed register (UART_MTK_HIGHS)
> + * Mediatek UARTs use an extra highspeed register (MTK_UART_HIGHS)
> *
> * We need to recalcualte the quot register, as the claculation depends
> * on the vaule in the highspeed register.
> @@ -230,18 +239,11 @@ static void mtk8250_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> port->uartclk / 16 / UART_DIV_MAX,
> port->uartclk);
>
> - if (baud <= 115200) {
> - serial_port_out(port, UART_MTK_HIGHS, 0x0);
> + if (baud < 115200) {
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_HIGHS, 0x0);
> quot = uart_get_divisor(port, baud);
> - } else if (baud <= 576000) {
> - serial_port_out(port, UART_MTK_HIGHS, 0x2);
> -
> - /* Set to next lower baudrate supported */
> - if ((baud == 500000) || (baud == 576000))
> - baud = 460800;
> - quot = DIV_ROUND_UP(port->uartclk, 4 * baud);
So we allow now also these baud rates? Then you have to update the comment as well.
Regards,
Matthias
> } else {
> - serial_port_out(port, UART_MTK_HIGHS, 0x3);
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_HIGHS, 0x3);
> quot = DIV_ROUND_UP(port->uartclk, 256 * baud);
> }
>
> @@ -258,17 +260,29 @@ static void mtk8250_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> /* reset DLAB */
> serial_port_out(port, UART_LCR, up->lcr);
>
> - if (baud > 460800) {
> + if (baud >= 115200) {
> unsigned int tmp;
>
> - tmp = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(port->uartclk, quot * baud);
> - serial_port_out(port, UART_MTK_SAMPLE_COUNT, tmp - 1);
> - serial_port_out(port, UART_MTK_SAMPLE_POINT,
> - (tmp - 2) >> 1);
> + tmp = (port->uartclk / (baud * quot)) - 1;
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_SAMPLE_COUNT, tmp);
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_SAMPLE_POINT,
> + (tmp >> 1) - 1);
> +
> + /*count fraction to set fractoin register */
> + fraction = ((port->uartclk * 100) / baud / quot) % 100;
> + fraction = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(fraction, 10);
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_FRACDIV_L,
> + fraction_L_mapping[fraction]);
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_FRACDIV_M,
> + fraction_M_mapping[fraction]);
> } else {
> - serial_port_out(port, UART_MTK_SAMPLE_COUNT, 0x00);
> - serial_port_out(port, UART_MTK_SAMPLE_POINT, 0xff);
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_SAMPLE_COUNT, 0x00);
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_SAMPLE_POINT, 0xff);
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_FRACDIV_L, 0x00);
> + serial_port_out(port, MTK_UART_FRACDIV_M, 0x00);
> }
> + if (uart_console(port))
> + up->port.cons->cflag = termios->c_cflag;
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
> /* Don't rewrite B0 */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists