linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kexec: quiet down kexec reboot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+CK2bD7crdQB3oJ97ATkYzGK3Bw_tA9zijoAgrLB9UeWO=1Gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Apr 2019 08:12:19 -0400
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        dyoung@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: quiet down kexec reboot

> > And kexec doesn't print many messages. When 'kexec -e' is executed,
> > much critical work need be done in 1st kernel, and also in 2nd kernel
> > till printed messages are seen. Sometime it could hang there without a
> > notice, because we need shutdown all devices before it. Keeping it can
> > at least tell which stage it is?
> >
> > No strong objection, just we may need enable it manually if silent
> > hang is met. Anyone has different opinion?
>
> Please ignore this mail, I must be dizzy. pr_notice looks good to me.
>

Thank you for looking at this.

Pasha