[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190425181736.GD23183@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:17:36 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
enric.balletbo@...labora.com, khilman@...libre.com,
matthew.hart@...aro.org, mgalka@...labora.com,
tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clk/clk-next boot bisection: v5.1-rc1-142-ga55b079c961b on panda
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 06:44:16PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> Also there aren't that many bisections, maybe a couple per month.
> I think we could cc the KernelCI reports mailing list, or maybe
> have a new list, for people who want to receive all the bisection
> reports. There should be more as we keep adding trees and
> especially when we start bisecting test suite results, not just
> boots.
This is the sort of thing that tends to go in phases as subsystems get
worked on IME - if something is getting disruptive work done on it you
can get a lot of issues for a while. You'd also see a lot more reports
if all boards got reported.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists