lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ccdcd117-9b34-ba01-b087-561642447af4@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:41:53 -0400
From:   Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     prsriva <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@...il.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, inux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        zohar@...ux.ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
        Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the
 call generic



On 04/25/2019 01:19 PM, prsriva wrote:
> On 2019-04-25 4:48 a.m., Nayna wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/23/2019 08:15 PM, Prakhar Srivastava wrote:
>>> From: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...rosoft.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>> The v2 version has to be on top of the HEAD of the repository itself, 
>> and not on the v1 version. Only the final reviewed and tested version 
>> makes to the upstream.
>>
>> Btw, which repository and its branch are you using ?
>>
> I am basing my changes off IMA branch:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git

Ok. Please use either next-integrity branch or James Morris next-general 
or next-testing.

Thanks & Regards,
       - Nayna


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ