[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez2h5Khw1tcizUKywtqEuUWpHsrGcWF+KN+X119B4MvmoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:10:28 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Adrian Reber <adrian@...as.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, criu@...nvz.org,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 01/27] ns: Introduce Time Namespace
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:14 PM Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com> wrote:
> Time Namespace isolates clock values.
>
> The kernel provides access to several clocks CLOCK_REALTIME,
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC, CLOCK_BOOTTIME, etc.
>
> CLOCK_REALTIME
> System-wide clock that measures real (i.e., wall-clock) time.
>
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC
> Clock that cannot be set and represents monotonic time since
> some unspecified starting point.
>
> CLOCK_BOOTTIME
> Identical to CLOCK_MONOTONIC, except it also includes any time
> that the system is suspended.
>
> For many users, the time namespace means the ability to changes date and
> time in a container (CLOCK_REALTIME).
>
> But in a context of the checkpoint/restore functionality, monotonic and
> bootime clocks become interesting. Both clocks are monotonic with
> unspecified staring points. These clocks are widely used to measure time
> slices and set timers. After restoring or migrating processes, we have to
> guarantee that they never go backward. In an ideal case, the behavior of
> these clocks should be the same as for a case when a whole system is
> suspended. All this means that we need to be able to set CLOCK_MONOTONIC
> and CLOCK_BOOTTIME clocks, what can be done by adding per-namespace
> offsets for clocks.
>
> A time namespace is similar to a pid namespace in a way how it is
> created: unshare(CLONE_NEWTIME) system call creates a new time namespace,
> but doesn't set it to the current process. Then all children of
> the process will be born in the new time namespace, or a process can
> use the setns() system call to join a namespace.
>
> This scheme allows setting clock offsets for a namespace, before any
> processes appear in it.
Is there a check anywhere to make sure that you can't use
clone(CLONE_VM) after calling unshare(CLONE_NEWTIME), and that you
can't use clone(CLONE_VM|CLONE_NEWTIME)? Those things probably
shouldn't be allowed, right?
CLONE_NEWPID has similar rules; from the clone.2 manpage:
EINVAL CLONE_THREAD was specified, but the current process previously
called unshare(2) with the CLONE_NEWPID flag or used setns(2)
to reassociate itself with a PID namespace.
[...]
EINVAL One (or both) of CLONE_NEWPID or CLONE_NEWUSER and one (or
both) of CLONE_THREAD or CLONE_PARENT were specified in flags.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists