[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8798fa4-a0dc-7c85-e294-bdf6dad6ec74@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:51:06 +0300
From: Oleksandr <olekstysh@...il.com>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: horms@...ge.net.au, magnus.damm@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mach-shmobile: Don't configure ARCH timer if PSCI is
enabled
On 24.04.19 15:31, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Julien
>
>>
>> As I answered in a previous email:
>>
>> > But "#if !defined(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI)" wraps secure_cntvoff_init()
>> call as
>> > well, which resets CNTVOFF,
>>
>> > and this is something I tried to avoid the first from being
>> executed on
>> > a CPU, which is in SVC mode (when running on top of Xen).
>>
>> What would be a proper way to avoid calling secure_cntvoff_init() at
>> runtime?
>>
>> Check that we are already in non-secure mode and/or cntvoff is
>> already 0?
>
> CNTVOFF is controlled by the hypervisor, so you cannot access it from
> Dom0.
>
> If none of this code should be necessary when PSCI is enabled, then
> you can check the presence of PSCI (see psci_smp_available()).
If I am not mistaken, U-Boot resets CNTVOFF before leaving monitor mode
(switching to non-secure state). This happens if "support for booting in
non-secure mode" is enabled.
This is a mandatory option for PSCI support as well as for support for
hardware virtualization.
So the presence of PSCI would be an indicator, if CNTVOFF was configured
in U-Boot and we don't need to.
From other hand, Gen2 Linux may be booted in non-secure mode, without
PSCI support...
I was thinking about checking the presence of "enable-method = psci" in
CPU node, but probably psci_smp_available() is better option.
Also, there is a specific device-tree property
"arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured" [1], but I am not sure whether it
is appropriate to use here.
>
> Another solution is to check whether we are running on xen (see
> xen_domain()).
>
> In any case, I would still surround the two checks because the
> "armgcnt" should really not be touched by Dom0.
Agree.
I will add two checks in V2.
Thank you!
[1]
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.1-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/arm,arch_timer.yaml#L68
>
> Cheers,
>
--
Regards,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists