linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 06/11] dt-bindings: net: ti: add new cpsw switch driver bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:50:25 +0300
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 06/11] dt-bindings: net: ti: add new cpsw
 switch driver bindings



On 26.04.19 01:40, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +Required Sub-nodes:
>> +- ports	: contains CPSW external ports descriptions
>> +	Required properties:
>> +	- #address-cells : Must be 1
>> +	- #size-cells : Must be 0
>> +	- reg : CPSW port number. Should be 1 or 2
>> +	- phys : phandle on phy-gmii-sel PHY (see phy/ti-phy-gmii-sel.txt)
>> +	- phy-mode : operation mode of the PHY interface [1]
>> +	- phy-handle : phandle to a PHY on an MDIO bus [1]
> 
> 
>> +		cpsw_port1: port@1 {
>> +			reg = <1>;
>> +			ti,label = "port1";
>> +			/* Filled in by U-Boot */
>> +			mac-address = [ 00 00 00 00 00 00 ];
>> +			phys = <&phy_gmii_sel 1>;
> 
> Hi Grygorii
> 
> phy-mode and phy-handle are required, but missing from your example.
> 
> Otherwise, this looks like a reasonable binding.

Yea. they configured in board files - will add.

Thanks. 

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii