[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190426084148.su4ez6oua7kgpgqx@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:41:48 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] panic: make panic start/end messages consistent
On Fri 2019-04-26 15:33:56, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> We don't have consistency:
> - we always print panic header
> pr_emerg("Kernel panic - not syncing:")
>
> - but we don't always print panic footer
> pr_emerg("---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing:")
>
> For instance, no panic footer (end panic) message will be
> printed when panic_timeout is set - the kernel will either
> reboot immediately after console_flush_on_panic() (emergency
> restart) or after panic_timeout seconds. Additionally,
> panic_print_sys_info() goes before panic footer line, which
> doesn't look very right, panic_print_sys_info() is just
> additional debugging into.
>
> Let's make it consistent:
>
> pr_emerg("Kernel panic - not syncing:")
> dump_stack();
> console_flush_on_panic();
> pr_emerg("---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing:")
>
> panic_print_sys_info();
> /* the rest */
> /* panic_timeout handling */
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Makes sense to me:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists