[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190426103249.GA5001@amd>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:32:49 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, lduncan@...e.com,
hare@...e.com, mcgrof@...nel.org, jthumshirn@...e.de, hch@....de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regression -next -- scsi: sd: Rely on the driver core for
asynchronous probing was Re: next-20190408..0418: Suspend/resume problems on
Thinkpad X60
On Thu 2019-04-25 06:35:58, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/25/19 12:33 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2019-04-24 13:56:01, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2019-04-24 at 22:51 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >>> Unfortunately, that one does not revert cleanly on top of -next.
> >>
> >> Can you try the following:
> >>
> >> git revert d16ece577bf2cee7f94bab75a0d967bcb89dd2a7 &&
> >> git revert 21e6ba3f0e0257cce1a226c1f15e0a8ba4338ca3
> >>
> >> I will see whether I can come up with a better way to analyze what is
> >> going on. I had not expected that these patches would cause any suspend/
> >> resume problems.
> >
> > Not even d16ece reverts:
> >
> > pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-next-32$ git show | head -3
> > commit 76c938fcaa4b4a5d8f05fa907925d5043834964e
> > Author: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Tue Apr 23 20:24:59 2019 +1000
> > pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-next-32$ git revert
> > d16ece577bf2cee7f94bab75a0d967bcb89dd2a7
> > error: could not revert d16ece5... scsi: sd: Inline sd_probe_part2()
> > hint: after resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths
> > hint: with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'
> > hint: and commit the result with 'git commit'
>
> There has been a non-trivial merge between the block and scsi trees in
> linux-next. That's probably what prevents these patches to revert
> cleanly. How about performing the following tests:
> * Build, boot and test Martin's latest for-5.2 branch
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git; branch
> 5.2/scsi-queue).
Ok, so that's commit a7634b6f7cbbdc6efcf772e080a6fe845d1f6161
. Suspend/resume is broken there.
> * If suspend/resume does not work reliably with that branch, revert the
> two patches above, rebuild, reboot and retest.
pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-next-32$ git show
commit a7634b6f7cbbdc6efcf772e080a6fe845d1f6161
Author: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-next-32$ git revert
d16ece577bf2cee7f94bab75a0d967bcb89dd2a7
Editing file: /data/fast/l/linux-next-32/.git/COMMIT_EDITMSG
1026
?
[detached HEAD 916db0d] Revert "scsi: sd: Inline sd_probe_part2()"
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
pavel@duo:/data/l/linux-next-32$ git revert
21e6ba3f0e0257cce1a226c1f15e0a8ba4338ca3
Editing file: /data/fast/l/linux-next-32/.git/COMMIT_EDITMSG
1163
?
[detached HEAD ac8d625] Revert "scsi: sd: Rely on the driver core for
asynchronous probing"
4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
And reverting those two indeed fixes it:
Checking version...
version is Linux amd 5.1.0-rc1autobisect1556274387+ #261 SMP Fri Apr
26 12:27:12 CEST 2019 i686 GNU/Linux
Running test...
Result is [ TEST SUCCESS ]
Test said TEST SUCCESS
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists