[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190426022554.56393-1-yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:25:54 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>,
Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: relocate chksum_offset for large_nat_bitmap feature
For large_nat_bitmap feature, there is a design flaw:
Previous:
struct f2fs_checkpoint layout:
+--------------------------+ 0x0000
| checkpoint_ver |
| ...... |
| checksum_offset |------+
| ...... | |
| sit_nat_version_bitmap[] |<-----|-------+
| ...... | | |
| checksum_value |<-----+ |
+--------------------------+ 0x1000 |
| | nat_bitmap + sit_bitmap
| payload blocks | |
| | |
+--------------------------|<-------------+
Obviously, if nat_bitmap size + sit_bitmap size is larger than
MAX_BITMAP_SIZE_IN_CKPT, nat_bitmap or sit_bitmap may overlap
checkpoint checksum's position, once checkpoint() is triggered
from kernel, nat or sit bitmap will be damaged by checksum field.
In order to fix this, let's relocate checksum_value's position
to the head of sit_nat_version_bitmap as below, then nat/sit
bitmap and chksum value update will become safe.
After:
struct f2fs_checkpoint layout:
+--------------------------+ 0x0000
| checkpoint_ver |
| ...... |
| checksum_offset |------+
| ...... | |
| sit_nat_version_bitmap[] |<-----+
| ...... |<-------------+
| | |
+--------------------------+ 0x1000 |
| | nat_bitmap + sit_bitmap
| payload blocks | |
| | |
+--------------------------|<-------------+
Related report and discussion:
https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-f2fs/mailman/message/36642346/
Reported-by: Park Ju Hyung <qkrwngud825@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
v2:
- improve hint message suggested by Ju Hyung.
- move verification to f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt().
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 4 +++-
fs/f2fs/super.c | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 119bc5a9783e..aa71c1aa9eaa 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -1909,9 +1909,11 @@ static inline void *__bitmap_ptr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int flag)
int offset;
if (is_set_ckpt_flags(sbi, CP_LARGE_NAT_BITMAP_FLAG)) {
+ unsigned int chksum_size = sizeof(__le32);
+
offset = (flag == SIT_BITMAP) ?
le32_to_cpu(ckpt->nat_ver_bitmap_bytesize) : 0;
- return &ckpt->sit_nat_version_bitmap + offset;
+ return &ckpt->sit_nat_version_bitmap + offset + chksum_size;
}
if (__cp_payload(sbi) > 0) {
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index fefc8cc6e756..22241bb866df 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -2714,6 +2714,19 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
return 1;
}
+ if (__is_set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_LARGE_NAT_BITMAP_FLAG)) {
+ unsigned int chksum_offset;
+
+ chksum_offset = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->checksum_offset);
+ if (chksum_offset != CP_MIN_CHKSUM_OFFSET) {
+ f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_WARNING,
+ "using deprecated layout of large_nat_bitmap, "
+ "please run fsck v1.13.0 or higher to repair, "
+ "chksum_offset: %u", chksum_offset);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+
if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR, "A bug case: need to run fsck");
return 1;
--
2.18.0.rc1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists