lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:03:11 +1000 (AEST) From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, prsriva <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>, Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@...il.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, inux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, vgoyal@...hat.com, Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...rosoft.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the call generic On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, James Bottomley wrote: > That's not the correct location: DMARC records should be at the _dmarc. > subdomain. without this you'll inherit the dmarc policy of > _dmarc.microsoft.com > Thanks. > > We don't have DKIM set up yet. > > If you advertise DMARC, you're expected to have DKIM working for spam > purposes. On the other hand, if you don't advertise DMARC, google will > probably still bin all your email as spam. Working on it. -- James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists