[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1904261002480.13876@namei.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:03:11 +1000 (AEST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
prsriva <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Nayna <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
inux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, vgoyal@...hat.com,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5 RFC] use event name instead of enum to make the
call generic
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, James Bottomley wrote:
> That's not the correct location: DMARC records should be at the _dmarc.
> subdomain. without this you'll inherit the dmarc policy of
> _dmarc.microsoft.com
>
Thanks.
> > We don't have DKIM set up yet.
>
> If you advertise DMARC, you're expected to have DKIM working for spam
> purposes. On the other hand, if you don't advertise DMARC, google will
> probably still bin all your email as spam.
Working on it.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists