| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:29:31 +0000
From: "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV SEND_START command
On 4/26/19 9:10 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 04:09:59PM +0000, Singh, Brijesh wrote:
>> The command is used to create an outgoing SEV guest encryption context.
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>> Cc: x86@...nel.org
>> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
>> ---
>> .../virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst | 24 +++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 12 +++
>> 3 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst
>> index 659bbc093b52..340ac4f87321 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst
>> @@ -238,6 +238,30 @@ Returns: 0 on success, -negative on error
>> __u32 trans_len;
>> };
>>
>> +10. KVM_SEV_SEND_START
>> +----------------------
>> +
>> +The KVM_SEV_SEND_START command can be used by the hypervisor to create an
>> +outgoing guest encryption context.
>> +
>> +Parameters (in): struct kvm_sev_send_start
>> +
>> +Returns: 0 on success, -negative on error
>> +
>> +::
>> + struct kvm_sev_send_start {
>> + __u32 policy; /* guest policy */
>> +
>> + __u64 pdh_cert_uaddr; /* platform Diffie-Hellman certificate */
>> + __u32 pdh_cert_len;
>> +
>> + __u64 plat_cert_uaddr; /* platform certificate chain */
>> + __u32 plat_cert_len;
>> +
>> + __u64 amd_cert_uaddr; /* AMD certificate */
>> + __u32 amd_cert_len;
>
> __u64 session_uaddr;
> __u32 session_len;
>
> too, right?
Ah good catch, I will fix in next rev. thanks
>
>> + };
>> +
>> References
>> ==========
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> index 406b558abfef..4c2a225ba546 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>> @@ -6955,6 +6955,104 @@ static int sev_launch_secret(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int sev_send_start(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
>> + void *amd_cert = NULL, *session_data = NULL;
>> + void *pdh_cert = NULL, *plat_cert = NULL;
>> + struct sev_data_send_start *data = NULL;
>> + struct kvm_sev_send_start params;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!sev_guest(kvm))
>> + return -ENOTTY;
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(¶ms, (void __user *)(uintptr_t)argp->data,
>> + sizeof(struct kvm_sev_send_start)))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* userspace wants to query the session length */
>> + if (!params.session_len)
>> + goto cmd;
>> +
>> + if (!params.pdh_cert_uaddr || !params.pdh_cert_len ||
>> + !params.session_uaddr)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /* copy the certificate blobs from userspace */
>> + pdh_cert = psp_copy_user_blob(params.pdh_cert_uaddr, params.pdh_cert_len);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pdh_cert)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(pdh_cert);
>> + goto e_free;
>> + }
>> +
>> + data->pdh_cert_address = __psp_pa(pdh_cert);
>> + data->pdh_cert_len = params.pdh_cert_len;
>> +
>> + plat_cert = psp_copy_user_blob(params.plat_cert_uaddr, params.plat_cert_len);
>> + if (IS_ERR(plat_cert)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(plat_cert);
>> + goto e_free_pdh;
>> + }
>> +
>> + data->plat_cert_address = __psp_pa(plat_cert);
>> + data->plat_cert_len = params.plat_cert_len;
>> +
>> + amd_cert = psp_copy_user_blob(params.amd_cert_uaddr, params.amd_cert_len);
>> + if (IS_ERR(amd_cert)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(amd_cert);
>> + goto e_free_plat_cert;
>> + }
>> +
>> + data->amd_cert_address = __psp_pa(amd_cert);
>> + data->amd_cert_len = params.amd_cert_len;
>> +
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + session_data = kmalloc(params.session_len, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> If the user is supposed to query the session length first, you could
> save it in a global variable perhaps and use that value instead of
> trusting the user to give you the correct one in params.session_len for
> the allocation...
>
Yes that's doable but I am afraid that caching the value may lead us to
wrong path and also divergence from the SEV API spec. The spec says the
returned length is a minimum length but its possible that caller can
give a bigger buffer and FW will still work with it.
>> + if (!session_data)
>> + goto e_free_amd_cert;
>> +
>> + data->session_address = __psp_pa(session_data);
>> + data->session_len = params.session_len;
>> +cmd:
>> + data->handle = sev->handle;
>> + ret = sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_SEND_START, data, &argp->error);
>> +
>> + /* if we queried the session length, FW responded with expected data */
>
> <--- ... here you have the session length from the fw.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists