lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:04:33 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <>
To:     Lu Baolu <>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <>,
        David Woodhouse <>,
        Joerg Roedel <>,,,,,,,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <>,
        Marek Szyprowski <>,
        Robin Murphy <>,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] swiotlb: Factor out slot allocation and free

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:07:19AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> This is not VT-d specific. It's just how generic IOMMU works.
> Normally, IOMMU works in paging mode. So if a driver issues DMA with
> IOVA  0xAAAA0123, IOMMU can remap it with a physical address 0xBBBB0123.
> But we should never expect IOMMU to remap 0xAAAA0123 with physical
> address of 0xBBBB0000. That's the reason why I said that IOMMU will not
> work there.

Well, with the iommu it doesn't happen.  With swiotlb it obviosuly
can happen, so drivers are fine with it.  Why would that suddenly
become an issue when swiotlb is called from the iommu code?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists