lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190426151731.GX2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:17:31 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     y2038@...ts.linaro.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: use timespec64 in relatime_need_update

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 04:50:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> For some reason, the conversion of the VFS code away from 'struct timespec'
> left one function behind that still uses it, for absolutely no reason.
> 
> Using timespec64 will make the atime update logic work correctly past
> y2038.

Applied.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ