linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND] i2c-piix4: Add Hygon Dhyana SMBus support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:37:49 +0800
From:   Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
CC:     "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RESEND] i2c-piix4: Add Hygon Dhyana SMBus support

On 2019/4/27 0:48, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 22:23 +0800, Pu Wen wrote:
>> On 2019/4/26 17:38, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> I would like you to also document the new supported chipset in
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig and Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4 as
>>> well as in the header comment of i2c-piix4.c itself. I know it seems
>>> redundant but it helps the user know which driver they need.
>>
>> Because Hygon uses the same PCI device ID of AMD's, so is it appropriate
>> to document with the name "Hygon CZ" or just "Hygon"?
> 
> "Hygon CZ" please, as Hygon is the vendor not the device, and I can

Okay.

> imagine you may create more devices in the future.

Surely.

-- 
Regards,
Pu Wen