linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/12] net: ll_temac: Fix support for 64-bit platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y33val3t.fsf@geanix.com>
Date:   Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:49:42 +0200
From:   Esben Haabendal <esben@...nix.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Yang Wei <yang.wei9@....com.cn>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] net: ll_temac: Fix support for 64-bit platforms

Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> writes:

> Looking closer at the series it kind of looks like a soft IP.

It is a soft IP.

> Esben, is there anything architecture specific here?  Should we perhaps
> drop the dependency on the architectures in patch 6 completely?

No, I don't think there is anything really architecture specific here.
Anything with PCIe should be able to utilize the LL TEMAC soft IP and
use this driver.

I don't mind dropping the architecture dependencies.

/Esben