[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1556377989.812674275@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 16:13:09 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 058/202] tty: Handle problem if line discipline does
not have receive_buf
3.16.66-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
commit 27cfb3a53be46a54ec5e0bd04e51995b74c90343 upstream.
Some tty line disciplines do not have a receive buf callback, so
properly check for that before calling it. If they do not have this
callback, just eat the character quietly, as we can't fail this call.
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -2219,7 +2219,8 @@ static int tiocsti(struct tty_struct *tt
return -EFAULT;
tty_audit_tiocsti(tty, ch);
ld = tty_ldisc_ref_wait(tty);
- ld->ops->receive_buf(tty, &ch, &mbz, 1);
+ if (ld->ops->receive_buf)
+ ld->ops->receive_buf(tty, &ch, &mbz, 1);
tty_ldisc_deref(ld);
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists