[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1556377989.556690474@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 16:13:09 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Phil Sutter" <phil@....cc>,
"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 161/202] netfilter: nf_tables: fix flush after rule
deletion in the same batch
3.16.66-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
commit 23b7ca4f745f21c2b9cfcb67fdd33733b3ae7e66 upstream.
Flush after rule deletion bogusly hits -ENOENT. Skip rules that have
been already from nft_delrule_by_chain() which is always called from the
flush path.
Fixes: cf9dc09d0949 ("netfilter: nf_tables: fix missing rules flushing per table")
Reported-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Acked-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
- Use nft_rule_is_active_next() instead of nft_is_active_next()
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -1897,6 +1897,9 @@ static int nf_table_delrule_by_chain(str
int err;
list_for_each_entry(rule, &ctx->chain->rules, list) {
+ if (!nft_rule_is_active_next(ctx->net, rule))
+ continue;
+
err = nf_tables_delrule_one(ctx, rule);
if (err < 0)
return err;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists