[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABeXuvrY9QdvF1gTfiMt-eVp7VtobwG9xzjQFkErq+3wpW_P3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 16:31:44 -0700
From: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To: Eric Wong <e@...24.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Omar Kilani <omar.kilani@...il.com>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Strange issues with epoll since 5.0
I tried to replicate the failure on qemu.
I do not see the failure with N=32.
Does it work for N < 32?
Does any other signal work?
Are there any other architectures that fail?
Could you help me figure out how to run just the one test that is failing?
-Deepa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists