| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 06:31:15 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: introduce DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE
On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019-4-24 17:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 04/15, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Previously, f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(, blkaddr, DATA_GENERIC) will check
> >> whether @blkaddr locates in main area or not.
> >>
> >> That check is weak, since the block address in range of main area can
> >> point to the address which is not valid in segment info table, and we
> >> can not detect such condition, we may suffer worse corruption as system
> >> continues running.
> >>
> >> So this patch introduce DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE to enhance the sanity check
> >> which trigger SIT bitmap check rather than only range check.
> >>
> >> This patch did below changes as wel:
> >> - set SBI_NEED_FSCK in f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr().
> >> - get rid of is_valid_data_blkaddr() to avoid panic if blkaddr is invalid.
> >> - introduce verify_fio_blkaddr() to wrap fio {new,old}_blkaddr validation check.
> >> - spread blkaddr check in:
> >> * f2fs_get_node_info()
> >> * __read_out_blkaddrs()
> >> * f2fs_submit_page_read()
> >> * ra_data_block()
> >> * do_recover_data()
> >>
> >> This patch can fix bug reported from bugzilla below:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203215
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203223
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203231
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203235
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203241
> >
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > This introduces failures on xfstests/generic/446, and I'm testing the below
> > patch on top of this. Could you check this patch, so that I could combine
> > both of them?
> >
> > From 8c1808c1743ad75d1ad8d1dc5a53910edaf7afd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:21:07 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: consider data race on read and truncation on
> > DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE
> >
> > DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE enhanced to validate block addresses on read/write paths.
> > But, xfstest/generic/446 compalins some generated kernel messages saying invalid
> > bitmap was detected when reading a block. The reaons is, when we get the
> > block addresses from extent_cache, there is no lock to synchronize it from
> > truncating the blocks in parallel.
> >
> > This patch tries to return EFAULT without warning and setting SBI_NEED_FSCK
> > in this case.
> >
> > Fixes: ("f2fs: introduce DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE")
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > fs/f2fs/data.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
> > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 ++++++
> > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 9 ++++++---
> > 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index e37fbbf843a5..805a33088e82 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -130,26 +130,28 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_tmp_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t index)
> > return __get_meta_page(sbi, index, false);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool __is_bitmap_valid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr)
> > +static bool __is_bitmap_valid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr,
> > + int type)
> > {
> > struct seg_entry *se;
> > unsigned int segno, offset;
> > bool exist;
> >
> > + if (type != DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE && type != DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
> > offset = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, blkaddr);
> > se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
> >
> > exist = f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->cur_valid_map);
> > -
> > - if (!exist) {
> > + if (!exist && type == DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) {
> > f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR, "Inconsistent error "
> > "blkaddr:%u, sit bitmap:%d", blkaddr, exist);
> > set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> > WARN_ON(1);
> > - return false;
> > }
> > - return true;
> > + return exist;
> > }
> >
> > bool f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > @@ -173,23 +175,22 @@ bool f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > return false;
> > break;
> > case META_POR:
> > + if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
> > + blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi)))
> > + return false;
> > + break;
> > case DATA_GENERIC:
> > case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE:
> > + case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ:
> > if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
> > - blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) {
> > - if (type == DATA_GENERIC ||
> > - type == DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) {
> > - f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_WARNING,
> > - "access invalid blkaddr:%u", blkaddr);
> > - set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> > - WARN_ON(1);
> > - }
> > + blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) {
> > + f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_WARNING,
> > + "access invalid blkaddr:%u", blkaddr);
> > + set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> > + WARN_ON(1);
> > return false;
> > } else {
> > - if (type == DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) {
> > - if (!__is_bitmap_valid(sbi, blkaddr))
> > - return false;
> > - }
> > + return __is_bitmap_valid(sbi, blkaddr, type);
> > }
> > break;
> > case META_GENERIC:
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 34d248ac9e0f..d32a82f25f5a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -564,9 +564,6 @@ static struct bio *f2fs_grab_read_bio(struct inode *inode, block_t blkaddr,
> > struct bio_post_read_ctx *ctx;
> > unsigned int post_read_steps = 0;
> >
> > - if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))
> > - return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> > -
> > bio = f2fs_bio_alloc(sbi, min_t(int, nr_pages, BIO_MAX_PAGES), false);
> > if (!bio)
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > @@ -597,9 +594,6 @@ static int f2fs_submit_page_read(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
> > struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> > struct bio *bio;
> >
> > - if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))
> > - return -EFAULT;
> > -
> > bio = f2fs_grab_read_bio(inode, blkaddr, 1, 0);
> > if (IS_ERR(bio))
> > return PTR_ERR(bio);
> > @@ -741,6 +735,11 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_read_data_page(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> >
> > if (f2fs_lookup_extent_cache(inode, index, &ei)) {
> > dn.data_blkaddr = ei.blk + index - ei.fofs;
> > + if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode), dn.data_blkaddr,
> > + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)) {
>
> If I'm not missing anything, we just need use DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ to cover
> below two paths:
> - gc_data_segment -> f2fs_get_read_data_page
> - move_data_page -> f2fs_get_lock_data_page -> f2fs_get_read_data_page
>
> Other paths which calls f2fs_get_read_data_page is safe to verify blkaddr with
> DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE?
The rule for here is, if block address is given by extent cache, we need to use
ENHANCE_READ. If it's coming from dnode lock, I think it'd be safe.
>
> > + err = -EFAULT;
> > + goto put_err;
> > + }
> > goto got_it;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -754,6 +753,13 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_read_data_page(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> > err = -ENOENT;
> > goto put_err;
> > }
> > + if (dn.data_blkaddr != NEW_ADDR &&
> > + !f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode),
> > + dn.data_blkaddr,
> > + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> > + err = -EFAULT;
> > + goto put_err;
> > + }
> > got_it:
> > if (PageUptodate(page)) {
> > unlock_page(page);
> > @@ -1566,7 +1572,7 @@ static int f2fs_read_single_page(struct inode *inode, struct page *page,
> > }
> >
> > if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode), block_nr,
> > - DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> > + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)) {
> > ret = -EFAULT;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > @@ -2528,6 +2534,11 @@ static int f2fs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
> > zero_user_segment(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> > SetPageUptodate(page);
> > } else {
> > + if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr,
> > + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)) {
>
> Need DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE because write() is exclusive with truncate() due to
> inode_lock()?
>
> Thanks,
>
> > + err = -EFAULT;
> > + goto fail;
> > + }
> > err = f2fs_submit_page_read(inode, page, blkaddr);
> > if (err)
> > goto fail;
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index f5ffc09705eb..533fafca68f4 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -212,6 +212,12 @@ enum {
> > META_POR,
> > DATA_GENERIC, /* check range only */
> > DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE, /* strong check on range and segment bitmap */
> > + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ, /*
> > + * strong check on range and segment
> > + * bitmap but no warning due to race
> > + * condition of read on truncated area
> > + * by extent_cache
> > + */
> > META_GENERIC,
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > index 3a097949b5d4..963fb4571fd9 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > @@ -656,6 +656,11 @@ static int ra_data_block(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
> >
> > if (f2fs_lookup_extent_cache(inode, index, &ei)) {
> > dn.data_blkaddr = ei.blk + index - ei.fofs;
> > + if (unlikely(!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dn.data_blkaddr,
> > + DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ))) {
> > + err = -EFAULT;
> > + goto put_page;
> > + }
> > goto got_it;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -669,14 +674,12 @@ static int ra_data_block(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
> > err = -ENOENT;
> > goto put_page;
> > }
> > -
> > -got_it:
> > if (unlikely(!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dn.data_blkaddr,
> > DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))) {
> > err = -EFAULT;
> > goto put_page;
> > }
> > -
> > +got_it:
> > /* read page */
> > fio.page = page;
> > fio.new_blkaddr = fio.old_blkaddr = dn.data_blkaddr;
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists