[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB647954050987E2A44F459752E3380@VE1PR04MB6479.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 02:28:00 +0000
From: "S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "timur@...nel.org" <timur@...nel.org>,
"nicoleotsuka@...il.com" <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
"Xiubo.Lee@...il.com" <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ASoC: fsl_esai: Add pm runtime function
Hi Mark
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:51:15AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 02:31:55AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > > Add pm runtime support and move clock handling there.
> > > > Close the clocks at suspend to reduce the power consumption.
>
> > > > fsl_esai_suspend is replaced by pm_runtime_force_suspend.
> > > > fsl_esai_resume is replaced by pm_runtime_force_resume.
>
> > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
>
> > Which branch are you using? I tried for-next and for-linus, both Are
> > successful applied.
>
> I'm applying against for-5.2, though if it depends on a patch queued for
> 5.1 that's fine, I can just merge that up - please just resend. I think I did try
> merging 5.1 though...
I think may be caused by the patch " ASoC: fsl_esai: Fix missing break
in switch statement", so I resend them both base on for-5.2.
best regards
wang shengjiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists