linux-kernel - [PATCH] memcg, oom: no oom-kill for __GFP_RETRY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190428235613.166330-1-shakeelb@google.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 Apr 2019 16:56:13 -0700
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] memcg, oom: no oom-kill for __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL

The documentation of __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL clearly mentioned that the
OOM killer will not be triggered and indeed the page alloc does not
invoke OOM killer for such allocations. However we do trigger memcg
OOM killer for __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL. Fix that.

Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 2713b45ec3f0..99eca724ed3b 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2294,7 +2294,6 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
 	bool may_swap = true;
 	bool drained = false;
-	bool oomed = false;
 	enum oom_status oom_status;
 
 	if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
@@ -2381,7 +2380,7 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	if (nr_retries--)
 		goto retry;
 
-	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL && oomed)
+	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL)
 		goto nomem;
 
 	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
@@ -2400,7 +2399,6 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	switch (oom_status) {
 	case OOM_SUCCESS:
 		nr_retries = MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
-		oomed = true;
 		goto retry;
 	case OOM_FAILED:
 		goto force;
-- 
2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog