lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 28 Apr 2019 20:27:54 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <>
To:     Linus Torvalds <>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <>,
        Ingo Molnar <>,
        Will Deacon <>,
        Thomas Gleixner <>,
        Borislav Petkov <>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <>,
        Tim Chen <>,
        huang ying <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-tip v7 00/20] locking/rwsem: Rwsem rearchitecture part 2

On 4/28/19 8:10 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 4:12 PM Waiman Long <> wrote:
>> I implemented your suggestion in patch 1 as it will produce simpler and
>> faster code. However, one of the changes in my patchset is to wake up
>> all the readers in the wait list. This means I have to jump over the
>> writers and wake up the readers behind them as well. See patch 11 for
>> details. As a result, I have to revert back to use list_add_tail() and
>> list_for_each_entry_safe() for the first pass. That is why the diff for
>> the whole patchset is just the below change. It is done on purpose, not
>> an omission.
> Ahh, ok. In that case I suspect the clever code isn't even worth it,
> since it very much depends on just splitting the list in a fixed
> place.
>                    Linus

Not really, this is a serious problem that have to be backported to
earlier stable releases and downstream. The clever code is helpful in
those cases.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists